Archives for posts with tag: Stoneware

Often when a group of historically significant objects is broken up it is viewed as a loss in the eyes of historians. Pieces of rare China, for example, may be individually sold off from a set and become statement pieces, isolated from their legacy and therefore forgotten. However, this Dansk stoneware mug and ceramics like it tell a different story. Although separated from its original three-piece set, through online dealing on platforms like Etsy it has been combined with pieces of other sets to become part of a unique ceramic group. As a one-of-a-kind set, these objects can continue to reveal their evolving social context to historians. 

Dansk BLT Stoneware Mug. Late 20th century. Private Collection, Cooperstown, New York. Photograph by George Macko 

This stoneware mug is of a Dansk style known as BLT (Breakfast, Lunch and Tea), characterized by its brown sandstone body and single brown stripe.1 Some versions also exist with a blue stripe, but all variations of this style have been discontinued. BLT dinnerware was manufactured and sold in sets of three pieces with a mug, a bowl, and a plate under the slogan “Less is enough.”2 Additional dishes, including small plates, sugar bowls and creamers were produced in the same style, but not as a collective set for a large family. 

Original Dansk BLT Set, “Vintage Dansk BLT Sandstone 3 Piece Place Setting,” Etsy, 2023. https://www.etsy.com/listing/1521775506/vintage-dansk-blt-sandstone-3-piece.

Ted and Martha Nierenberg founded Dansk in 1954 to “bring the elegant simplicity and natural materials of Scandinavian design to the American market at reasonable prices.”3 The primary inspiration for the company came from Denmark, denoted by the name which is the Danish word for Danish. Over the years, Dansk has largely stuck to traditional, mid-century designs derived from Danish dinnerware. 

As may be expected with a company as long-lived as Dansk, very few of its original designs are still in production. While made from relatively inexpensive material, the limited number of BLT sets has boosted their value and made them a feature in museums as well as kitchens.4 With the increase in value of pieces like this and the use of online platforms like Etsy and eBay to conduct sales, an inevitable consequence is that sets of dishes are broken up. In fact, it is rare to see a complete, original BLT set for sale on any online platform. However, a quick examination of the BLT pieces for sale shows that buying and selling these pieces online can also have the opposite effect, with pieces from multiple sets being combined to be sold in groupings that were never produced by Dansk.

Unique Dansk BLT Set, “Vintage Dansk BLT (Breakfast Lunch Tea) stoneware pottery set | plates bowls mugs | Niels Refsgaard,” Etsy, 2023. https://www.etsy.com/listing/1241323263/vintage-dansk-blt-breakfast-lunch-tea.

Sets like this therefore hold a precarious position in the world of modern ceramics. On the one hand, they are not so rare that owners will value keeping pieces together above all else. Their identical manufacturing ensures that any mug will go with any plate of the same style, and there is not the risk of mismatching sets as there may be with fine China and porcelain. At the same time, their limited quantity and unique look is enough to make them sought after. With the visibility provided by online shopping, the social context of ceramics like these will continue to evolve as they are brought together into new combinations to suit the individual needs of modern consumers. 

  1. “Each Little World: China Syndrome,” 2011. https://www.lindabrazill.com/each_little_world/2011/08/china-syndrome.html↩︎
  2. “Vintage Dansk BLT Sandstone 3 Piece Place Setting,” Etsy, 2023. https://www.etsy.com/listing/1521775506/vintage-dansk-blt-sandstone-3-piece↩︎
  3. “The Dansk Revolution,” Dansk, 2023. https://www.dansk.com/pages/about. ↩︎
  4. Mel Studach, “Food52 Acquires Dansk, Plans for Danish-Designed Homeware Brand’s Revival,” ADPRO, 2021. https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/food52-acquires-dansk-plans-for-the-danish-homeware-brands-revival↩︎

By Emily Q Welch

Medicine is part of daily American life, whether in the form of prescription antibiotics or over the counter pain killers. Our constant consumption of medicine means that not only do medical practitioners go through strenuous education and training, the drugs they prescribe are

Microbe Killer Jug

Microbe Killer No. 2 Jug, 1886-1913, W.M. Radam, stoneware with wooden cork, H: 15 x W: 7 x D: 8 in. New York State Historical Association, Cooperstown, New York, N0033.1975, Photographed by Emily Q Welch

similarly sent through rigorous testing before reaching the general public. Development of new drugs can take up to ten years, consisting of pre-clinical, non-human testing, three stages of clinical testing on people and final approval by the FDA[1]. However, the medical field as we know it today was developed after years of trial and error and was once plagued with quack-doctors and their falsified remedies for all ailments. A prime example is encapsulated by this stoneware jug, labeled “WM RADAM’S MICROBE KILLER NO. 2”.

W.M. Radam was a Prussian immigrant gardener who first began his medical “practice” after several trained doctors failed to cure him of his own varied ailments in the late 1800’s. In his search for a cure, he stumbled upon the concept of “microbes,”, which he compared to pests in a garden. He developed his “microbe killer” and sold it to the masses, after recieving his September 28th, 1886 patent on the microbe killer, opening seventeen production facilities across the nation, proclaiming his remedy could cure all illnesses simply by imbibing it until the body’s tissues were soaked in it and the microbes were rid of the body [2]. However, in 1913, a lawsuit was brought against Radam as chemists claimed his remedy a complete hoax, lacking any curative properties at all [3]. Daniel R. Barnett says in his article on the subject, “The 1886 patent revealed that Radam manufactured Microbe Killer by mixing powdered sulfur, sodium nitrate, manganese oxide, sandalwood, and potassium chloride and burning the mixture in an oven; the vapors mixed with vapor from water located in a closed tank in which the oven sat. After the treated water was allowed to condense and then filtered to remove any sediment, a tiny amount of wine was added to give the Microbe Killer a light pink tint”[2]. The federal lawsuit that followed won national attention as Minneapolis court systems assessed the validity of the claims [4]. Yet, it is no surprise that On November 28th, 1913 the court system confirmed this faux-remedy to be a hoax and ordered the “microbe killer” to be confiscated destroyed [3].

The thought of a similar medicinal hoax making it to the American marketplace today seems unlikely. However, herbal remedies and supplements that do not undergo such rigorous testing are still available to the public today. How far have our modern pharmacological practices only created a better distinction between bio-medicine and possible herbal-based fallacies? The story of the microbe killer still resonates with Americans today as medicine has only become further ingrained into the fabric of our culture. It is not out of place to ask, how long until the next “microbe killer” becomes incorporated into our medicine cabinets on the word of the next W.M. Radam?

[1]”Clinical Trials,” PhRMA, accessed November 21, 2015, http://www.phrma.org/innovation/clinical-trials

[2] Daniel R. Barnett. “William Radam and the Microbe Killer: An Account of Classic Medical Quackery from the Heart of Texas.” The North Texas Skeptic (2004). Accessed November 18, 2015. http://www.ntskeptics.org/2004/2004january/january2004.htm.

[3] B.T. Galloway. “Misbranding of Radam’s Microbe Killer.” U.S. Department of Agriculture Bureau of Chemistry Service and Regulatory Announcements 235-41 (1914) 235-241.

[4]“Government Wins in Microbe Killer Case.” The Journal of the National Association of Retail Druggists 150 (1914): 150.